Skip to main content
RapiTest - Functional testing for critical software
RapiCover - Low-overhead coverage analysis for critical software
RapiTime - In-depth execution time analysis for critical software
RapiTask - RTOS scheduling visualization
RVS Qualification Kits - Tool qualification for DO-178 B/C and ISO 26262 projects
RapiCouplingPreview - DCCC analysis
MACH178 - Multicore Avionics Certification for High-integrity DO-178C projects
MACH178 Foundations - Lay the groundwork for A(M)C 20-193 compliance
RapiDaemons - Analyze interference in multicore systems
RTBx - The ultimate data logging solution
Sim68020 - Simulation for the Motorola 68020 microprocessor
Data Coupling & Control Coupling
Training
Consultancy
Tool Integration
Support
RVS 3.23 Launched
Rapita System Announces New Distribution Partnership with COONTEC
Rapita partners with Asterios Technologies to deliver solutions in multicore certification
SAIF Autonomy to use RVS to verify their groundbreaking AI platform
How to measure stack usage through stack painting with RapiTest
What does AMACC Rev B mean for multicore certification?
How emulation can reduce avionics verification costs: Sim68020
Multicore timing analysis: to instrument or not to instrument
How to achieve multicore DO-178C certification with Rapita Systems
How to achieve DO-178C certification with Rapita Systems
Certifying Unmanned Aircraft Systems
DO-278A Guidance: Introduction to RTCA DO-278 approval
Certification-Ready Rust: GNAT Pro & RVS for Avionics Standards
DO-178C Multicore In-person Training (Fort Worth, TX)
Avionics Certification Q&A: CERT TALK (with Consunova and Visure)
DO-178C Multicore In-person Training (Toulouse)
Both instrumentation-based and zero-footprint (instrumentation-free) RVS verification tools are available to support the following activities:
- Structural coverage analysis – (RapiCover and RapiCoverZero)
- Worst-case execution time analysis (RapiTime and RapiTimeZero)
- Scheduling visualization – (RapiTask and RapiTaskZero)
Depending on your project and needs, instrumentation-based, zero-footprint, or both solutions for each activity may be better for you. Consult the table below to determine which is best for your project.
|
Feature |
RapiCover, RapiTime, RapiTask |
RapiCoverZero, RapiTimeZero, RapiTaskZero |
|---|---|---|
|
Works without source code |
No |
Yes |
|
Works without instrumentation |
No |
Yes |
|
Integration with development environment |
Integration needed |
No integration needed |
|
Tool qualification support |
(RapiCover and RapiTime only) Yes |
(RapiCoverZero and RapiTimeZero only) In development - contact us for details |
|
Trace size and data processing time |
Depends on applied instrumentation |
Typically larger trace and longer data processing times |
|
Supported platforms (target, data collection mechanism) |
Flexible, almost any platform supported (see compatibility) |
Requirements on platform (branch trace and context switch information must be available), PSP needed (see compatibility) |
|
MC/DC analysis (e.g. for DO-178C DAL A) |
(RapiCover only) Yes |
(RapiCoverZero only) No |
