Your browser does not support JavaScript! Skip to main content
Free 30-day trial DO-178C Handbook RapiCoupling Preview DO-178C Multicore Training Multicore Resources
Rapita Systems
 

Industry leading verification tools

Rapita Verification Suite (RVS)

RapiTest - Functional testing for critical software RapiCover - Low-overhead coverage analysis for critical software RapiTime - In-depth execution time analysis for critical software RapiTask - RTOS scheduling visualization RapiCoverZero - Zero-footprint coverage analysis RapitimeZero - Zero-footprint timing analysis RapiTaskZero - Zero-footprint event-level scheduling analysis RVS Qualification Kits - Tool qualification for DO-178 B/C and ISO 26262 projects RapiCoupling - DCCC analysis

Multicore Verification

MACH178 - Multicore Avionics Certification for High-integrity DO-178C projects MACH178 Foundations - Lay the groundwork for A(M)C 20-193 compliance Multicore Timing Solution - Solving the challenges of multicore timing analysis RapiDaemon - Analyze interference in multicore systems

Other

RTBx - The ultimate data logging solution Sim68020 - Simulation for the Motorola 68020 microprocessor

RVS Software Policy

Software licensing Product life cycle policy RVS Assurance issue policy RVS development roadmap

Industry leading verification services

Engineering Services

V&V Services Data Coupling & Control Coupling Object code verification Qualification Training Consultancy Tool Integration Support

Latest from Rapita HQ

Latest news

Rapita partners with Asterios Technologies to deliver solutions in multicore certification
SAIF Autonomy to use RVS to verify their groundbreaking AI platform
RVS 3.22 Launched
Hybrid electric pioneers, Ascendance, join Rapita Systems Trailblazer Partnership Program
View News

Latest from the Rapita blog

How emulation can reduce avionics verification costs: Sim68020
Multicore timing analysis: to instrument or not to instrument
How to certify multicore processors - what is everyone asking?
Data Coupling Basics in DO-178C
View Blog

Latest discovery pages

Military Drone Certifying Unmanned Aircraft Systems
control_tower DO-278A Guidance: Introduction to RTCA DO-278 approval
Picture of a car ISO 26262
DCCC Image Data Coupling & Control Coupling
View Discovery pages

Upcoming events

DASC 2025
2025-09-14
DO-178C Multicore In-person Training (Fort Worth, TX)
2025-10-01
DO-178C Multicore In-person Training (Toulouse)
2025-11-04
HISC 2025
2025-11-13
View Events

Technical resources for industry professionals

Latest White papers

Mitigation of interference in multicore processors for A(M)C 20-193
Sysgo WP
Developing DO-178C and ED-12C-certifiable multicore software
DO178C Handbook
Efficient Verification Through the DO-178C Life Cycle
View White papers

Latest Videos

How to make AI safe in autonomous systems with SAIF
Rapita Systems - Safety Through Quality
Simulation for the Motorola 68020 microprocessor with Sim68020
AI-driven Requirements Traceability for Faster Testing and Certification
View Videos

Latest Case studies

GMV case study front cover
GMV verify ISO26262 automotive software with RVS
Kappa: Verifying Airborne Video Systems for Air-to-Air Refueling using RVS
Supporting DanLaw with unit testing and code coverage analysis for automotive software
View Case studies

Other Resources

 Webinars

 Brochures

 Product briefs

 Technical notes

 Research projects

 Multicore resources

Discover Rapita

Who we are

The company menu

  • About us
  • Customers
  • Distributors
  • Locations
  • Partners
  • Research projects
  • Contact us
  • Careers
  • Working at Rapita

Industries

  Civil Aviation (DO-178C)   Automotive (ISO 26262)   Military & Defense   Space

US office

+1 248-957-9801
info@rapitasystems.com Rapita Systems, Inc., 41131 Vincenti Ct., Novi, MI 48375, USA

UK office

+44 (0)1904 413945
info@rapitasystems.com Rapita Systems Ltd., Atlas House, Osbaldwick Link Road, York, YO10 3JB, UK

Spain office

+34 93 351 02 05
info@rapitasystems.com Rapita Systems S.L., Parc UPC, Edificio K2M, c/ Jordi Girona, 1-3, Barcelona 08034, Spain
Back to Top Contact Us

RTCA DO-330/EUROCAE ED-215

DO-330: Software Tool Qualification Considerations

DO-178C itself describes when a tool must be qualified, but does not go into detail on how this should be done. The ED-215/DO-330: Software Tool Qualification Considerations supplement to DO-178C expands on this guidance by defining corresponding objectives for the specification, development and verification of qualified tools.

DO-330 guidance can be applied to any tools, not just those used for software development or verification, for example systems design or hardware development tools, and acts more like a stand-alone guidance document.

Many verification activities can be performed either manually or by using automated tools to help run the analysis. When automated tools are used to achieve a DO-178C objective without their output being verified, those tools must be qualified for use following the DO-330 Guidelines.

Tool qualification levels

DO-178C defines 3 sets of tool assessment criteria which, when combined with the DAL level of your software, are used to classify tool at one of 5 different Tool Qualification Levels (TQLs) as shown in table below.

CRITERIA DESIGN ASSURANCE LEVEL (DAL)
A B C D
Criteria 1:
  • output is part of the airborne software
  • could insert an error
TQL-1 TQL-2 TQL-3 TQL-4
Criteria 2:
  • could fail to detect an error
  • elimination or reduction of other processes
TQL-4 TQL-4 TQL-5 TQL-5
Criteria 3:
  • could fail to detect an error
TQL-5 TQL-5 TQL-5 TQL-5

For example, a code generator tool that converts an architectural description of the software into package or class structures fulfils criteria 1. Verification tools typically fall into Criteria 3 (and are thus classified at TQL-5) as they neither create airborne software nor eliminate or reduce any processes other than the ones for which they are intended. Criteria 2 typically applies in cases such as model-based testing with a qualified code generator. In this case, the task of verifying the generated code is eliminated or reduced in favor of testing the model, and so the model-based testing tool meets criteria 2.

Tools with a lower numbered TQL (e.g. 1) must be tested more rigorously than those with a higher numbered TQL (e.g. 5), and the rigor of testing needed for tools with lower numbered TQLs approaches the rigor needed for testing DAL A software.

If you use any commercial verification tools to automate DO-178C verification processes and don’t plan on manually reviewing output from the tools, they will need to be qualified at the appropriate tool qualification level.

DO-330 defines some tool qualification activities that must be performed by the tool developer and some that must be performed by the tool user.

Many commercial verification tools have supporting qualification kits, which include evidence needed to demonstrate that the activities the tool developer must perform have been performed. Generally, not all features of verification tools are qualified. For each feature you intend to use and for which the way you intend to use it would require tool qualification, you should check with the tool developer whether the feature is included in the qualification kit.

All qualification kits should include all of the evidence needed from the tool developer. Some qualification kits may also include supporting material to help meet tool user objectives. It may pay to ask tool vendors what the scope of their qualification kits is and how they can help you qualify the tool.

  • Solutions
    • Rapita Verification Suite
    • RapiTest
    • RapiCover
    • RapiTime
    • RapiTask
    • MACH178

    • Verification and Validation Services
    • Qualification
    • Training
    • Integration
  • Latest
  • Latest menu

    • News
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Videos
  • Downloads
  • Downloads menu

    • Brochures
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Product briefs
    • Technical notes
    • Software licensing
  • Company
  • Company menu

    • About Rapita
    • Careers
    • Customers
    • Distributors
    • Industries
    • Locations
    • Partners
    • Research projects
    • Contact
  • Discover
    • Multicore Timing Analysis
    • Embedded Software Testing Tools
    • Worst Case Execution Time
    • WCET Tools
    • Code coverage for Ada, C & C++
    • MC/DC Coverage
    • Verifying additional code for DO-178C
    • Timing analysis (WCET) & Code coverage for MATLAB® Simulink®
    • Data Coupling & Control Coupling
    • Aerospace Software Testing
    • DO-178C
    • Meeting DO-178C Objectives
    • AC 20-193 and AMC 20-193
    • Meeting A(M)C 20-193 Objectives
    • Certifying eVTOL
    • Cerifying UAS

All materials © Rapita Systems Ltd. 2025 - All rights reserved | Privacy information | Trademark notice Subscribe to our newsletter